When the Church Goes Her Specious Way

This quote, relayed by OPC Pastor Roger Wagner just after Havel’s recent death, stirs. Below, I do not discount the importance of a Christian’s understanding of Havel’s societal and political assessments—his fine assessments and comments I will add, but I pitch a point or two with respect to ideology as a specious way of relating to the church. The church, too, sports herself all things political. The traditionally reformed, confessional church must be aware of how she can situate herself in the grip of the deception per Havel's commentary.
Let’s do some work.
First, church history shows us that ideology is spelled g-n-o-s-t-i-c-i-s-m.
Wrongly, faith and life so often for the church get dignified by what is “above, below and on either side,” as Havel says. Dismiss the body; welcome disciplines of the mind. The church takes her cues about this from the model of many of us reformed preachers, who with a well-intentioned preaching aim, inadvertently reinforce this sad condition. We work at a particular job-well-done-atta boy by tracing out the lines of redemptive history in order to see what points to Christ. When we land the B-2 Stealth Biblical Theology Bomber, we think we can pronounce a hearty benediction and taxi back into the hanger. The mere show of a preacher's technique of the textual weave from Genesis to Revelation to Christ’s person and work reeks with ideology. We imagine the maintenance of a totalitarian reformed status quo. Danger abounds. It’s Christ without Christmas; Christ without skin and community. We legitimize Christianity exactly like those with their political phrases, and we practice veiling earthiness in the clothing of spiritual jargon and a Westminsterian competency. Keep it above and airy. We can preach this way and at the same time reside in the land of deception with respect to the church’s need to stand in the sinner’s place. Illusion “Я” us.
Next, trivialization crickets can chirp around the pulpit. Here’s another supposed power, another ideology; it’s when we preach proof texts as Havel’s “suprapersonal and objective.” Click, click, click—the sound of three-ring binders firing off across the pews where we’re ready to prove, prove, prove our points. We have word study after word study—and more…for note-taking. What can be wrong with proof texting? It’s a “specious way” of preaching. We knock on the door of the enlightenment. As Cal Thomas recently noted, “Evidence, alone, has never moved anyone from unbelief to faith. If proof were enough, all of the unbelieving contemporaries of Jesus (and Moses) would have believed in God because of the miracles they performed…Faith is not based solely on facts. It is a gift from a God…” Congregations do not live by proof texts alone. Proof-texting caters to the supposed supremacy of the intellect. Havel spots us on the dangers of this kind of pulpit ideology—with proof texting we preach categories of thought which makes it “easier… to part with” our identity, dignity and morality. At the corners of Easy Street and Proof-Texting Way, there’s little need for a traffic counter; the streets are bare. No one’s around; there’s no need for person to person accountability. After all, Christianity is largely about getting down gospel facts—getting the gospel right. This is life in Trivialization City.



I agree with Havel, ideology has her specious ways. Minding the mind and its maxims never save; when ideology is pulpit-fueled as direction toward people and God, it is fetid. As a preacher I have been rebuked. Lord, deliver me from my trust of the abstractions in this blog post. Amen.
G. Mark Sumpter
1 comment:
Wow...
May God crack and break my heart with all this...
Keep going, brother. God is real. And as you lay hold of it, keep throwing the rope back for us to grab a hold of.
matt
Post a Comment